×

New York

  • Monday - Friday

    8pm - 5am
  • Saturday

    8pm - 2am
  • Sunday

    Closed

Seattle

  • Monday - Friday

    8pm - 5am
  • Saturday

    8pm - 2am
  • Sunday

    Closed

Need Help?

Contact Us

SIGN IN YOUR ACCOUNT TO HAVE ACCESS TO DIFFERENT FEATURES

FORGOT YOUR PASSWORD?

FORGOT YOUR DETAILS?

AAH, WAIT, I REMEMBER NOW!
GET IN TOUCH
  • LOGIN
  • INFO

The 96 Guild

  • Home
  • News
  • Events
  • Contact
MEMBERSHIP
  • No products in cart.
  • Home
  • Blog
  • NEWS
  • End of the road for replicas? An analysis of the JLR copyright case in Sweden
Thursday, 15 April 2021 / Published in NEWS

End of the road for replicas? An analysis of the JLR copyright case in Sweden

By Nigel Adams, disputes Partner at Goodman Derrick LLP solicitors.

In the middle of January this year the High Court in Sweden gave judgment in favour JLR
regarding its claim that:

  1. It was the lawful owner of the copyright in the shape of the Jaguar C-Type; and
  2. That the activity of the Swedish company JLR sued because it was making replica C-Types
    was infringing JLR’s copyright, with the result that the company had to stop
    making further replicas and might also have to pay damages and costs to JLR as
    well.
    The decision in Sweden may be the subject of an appeal, but notwithstanding there may
    be another twist in this case the ruling so far has sent shockwaves throughout the classic
    car community.
    Most creative efforts, whether in writing, music, art etc., are capable of being protected
    by the law of copyright (or similar laws). In essence this law prevents third parties from
    exploiting the work of others without permission or compensation and protection arises
    automatically in those countries which recognise copyright law (and most countries do
    have their own copyright laws). The design of a car is capable of being protected by
    copyright in much the same way as any other 3D shape or design (think of it as a form of
    sculpture) and so it is not a terrific surprise that the Court in Sweden has ruled that the
    shape of the C-Type is protectable under copyright law – it is, after all, a very distinctive
    shape and was unlike anything else around at the time.
    Once the Court in Sweden has recognised that JLR holds the copyright in the C-Type shape
    it is once again no surprise that the Swedish business copying the design to make replica CTypes
    was told to stop. However, that is not the end of the road as it would be up to JLR
    to award permission to any business in Sweden that wanted to make C-Type replicas.
    Copyright works are routinely licenced for use by third parties who typically pay a flat fee
    for a licence or perhaps a fee graduated by reference to any profits made by their
    exploitation of the licensed work. In this case JLR could, if it wanted, licence the Swedish
    company to enable it to make further replicas, but JLR does not have to grant licences and
    it can now control who makes replica C-Types in Sweden by controlling to whom it grants a
    licence.
    The Swedish Court decision could be used by JLR (and other manufacturers) to launch
    similar proceedings in other countries, but it is by no means certain that the Courts of
    other countries would necessarily follow what the Swedish Court has decided – each Court
    would have to make its own mind up about whether copyright protection exists for a
    2
    particular shape or design. In addition to this JLR had to show that the chain of ownership
    of the copyright was unbroken from the original designer (attributed to Malcolm Sayer) to
    the current company asserting ownership (JLR). With older copyright works created years
    ago that task is not always easy and I have seen claims by well-known brands fall down
    because the chain of title was unclear, or ownership had not properly passed to the end
    manufacturing company. Not all manufacturers might achieve the same results as JLR has
    in Sweden. In addition, if a lot of replica activity has gone on unchecked for years, or even
    been encouraged by the official manufacturer, it might be difficult for an official
    manufacturer to get help from a Court.
    JLR has said that it does not want to undermine the goodwill the brand enjoys, but there
    should be no doubt that the Court decision will have alarmed many Jaguar and other
    enthusiasts in this country and around the world who own or manufacture replica classic
    cars. It remains to be seen if JLR seek to apply the decision in other countries or if any
    other manufacturers will seek to follow suit.
    We shall keep an eye on this story and bring news of how it develops in due course.
  • Tweet

What you can read next

TIGOSE Preferred Partner Khan Thornton in Motor Trade News
Not another Ferrari?
TIGOSE Members in Autocar

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The 96 Guild is proudly powered by WordPress

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are as essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT